|
Technology
Compared
Air purifiers and air cleaners
use a number of mechanisms to achieve their purpose. The following is a guide to
the main methods of air cleaning and purification. Often the manufacturers
will dream up new terminology to describe their particular machines function,
however, leaving aside the new names, the basic mechanisms remain as follows
Mechanical filtration
Electrostatic filtration
(type A)
Electrostatic filtration (type B)
Carbon
filtration
Ultra
Violet Light
Incinerators
Ozone
Mechanical filtration
Mechanical filters are made of a matrix of numerous fibres. Consider the
different filter effects at the scale of an individual fibre. Air is
passed through a filtration media. The dust particles are trapped by either;
-
Impingement is
where large particles collide with a fibre whilst the air is diverted round
the fibre and are retained.
-
Interception is
where smaller particles move with the air flow but are attracted to the
fibre with a stronger force than carries the particle in the air stream.
-
Diffusion is
where the particles are so small that they follow irregular path like gas
molecules (Brownian motion) and randomly collide with fibres and are
retained.
-
Straining occurs
when a particle is too large to pass between the gaps in the fibre matrix.
In most
air cleaner filters treating domestic air all of these filtration effects
are happening at once, giving an overall particle removal efficiency. Air
cleaners with mechanical filters always need a fan to move the air through
the filter. The
efficiency of an air cleaner with mechanical filters depends on the quality
of the filter, the air velocity through the filter and the state of the
filter (how laden with dust)
| Pros |
Cons |
-
As mechanical
filters become more laden with dust as they are used, the more efficient
they become.
-
These type of
air cleaners can be very straight forward and very robust, with easily
available, cheap and fitted spare parts
-
You can in
most cases get a filter of a efficiency to catch and hold the particles that
are a problem
-
These actually
remove the particles from the air, rather than change them. There for they
reduce the dust settlement on surfaces rather than increase the dust
settlement
-
Easy to
maintain
|
-
As mechanical
filters become more laden with dust as they are used, the lower the airflow
becomes (i.e. pressure resistance of filter increases)
-
Because they
have to over come the pressure resistance of a filter, fans in these types
of air cleaners tend to be more powerful, therefore generate a higher sound
level that would otherwise be the case
-
Watch out for
air cleaners in plastic moulded bodies and components. They will not be as
robust as ones made of wood or steel, although should be fine for domestic
applications.
|

Electrostatic filtration
(type A)
Electrostatic filters are sometimes referred to as electrostatic precipitators. They comprise of a
'spiked ioniser' which charges dust particles and a bank of collector plates
which are oppositely charged to attract the dust particles. The Trion air
cleaners listed on this site work by this principle.
| Pros |
Cons |
-
The collector
plates are easily removed and cleaned, therefore there is not a requirement
for ongoing replacement filters.
-
They should
be less noisy that air cleaners with mechanical filters as the fan does not
have to work so hard to pull the air through the machine
|
-
Without
special suppression circuitry they can be prone to make a crackling noise
particularly when the collector plates are dirty. Trion units have special
suppression circuitry to prevent this.
|

Electrostatic filtration (type B)
These
are basically mechanical filters with a twist. The fibres are synthetic and
they therefore can hold an electrostatic charge, which means that the
interception effect is vastly increased. Some
electrostatic cleaners use a glass fibre media between charged meshes. The
charges meshes apply a static charge to the dust particles and these then
are more efficiently trapped by the glass fibres.
| Pros |
Cons |
-
The filtration
efficiency of a mechanical filter can be matched with less media, therefore
slightly smaller aircleaners.
-
The filtration
efficiency of a mechanical filter can be matched with a more open structure
of media, therefore less fan power required to overcome the media and less
noise
|
-
The media will
over the life of the filter discharge as the fibres become covered in
trapped dust. Theoretically this matting of dust increased the surface area
of the fibres and decreases the porosity of the media which means that the
electrostatic efficiency loss is offset by an increase in efficiency by
mechanical filtration.
|

Carbon
filtration
Carbon
is deployed in a filter in an ‘activated’ state. This means that the pore
structure inside the carbon has been massively enhanced to open up all the
pores and to increase the internal surface area of the carbon. Larger gas
molecules tend to be attracted to carbon surface in the pores, by what are
known as Van der Walls forces. Activated carbon is usually in the form of
small granules which are used to make the filter either as a granular
biscuit or sandwiched between layers of other filter material. As the air
passes through the filter, the contaminant molecules are attracted and held
(adsorbed) by the carbon.
| Pros |
Cons |
-
Carbon filters
can be very good at removing smells, airborne chemicals like ozone, volatile
organic compounds and various oxides of sulphur and nitrogen
|
-
Carbon will
prefer to adsorb heavier molecules to light ones. Where the carbon is coming
to the end of its life as a filter, light molecules can be displaced by
larger ones (preferential adsorption)
-
The
smaller the carbon filter the lower the filter life will be. The cheaper the
filter/air cleaner the smaller the carbon quantity
-
The efficiency
at removing particles will depend in part on the efficiency of the substrate materials supporting the carbon
-
Often carbon
filters in domestic air cleaners have so little carbon that they are more or
less useless, and are included as a gimmick feature.
|

Ultra
Violet Light. (Sometimes known as photo plasma or light plasma)
UV
light is very good at inhibiting growth of many micro organisms and fungi.
Moreover sufficient doses of UV light (intensity x exposure) at the right
wavelength can break down mould, germs, viruses, bacteria and spores in the
air.
In UV based air cleaners, air is moved (usually with a fan) through a
UV chamber that comprises of UV lamps, and reflective inner surfaces to the
chamber. The intensity and time within the chamber will determine the
effectiveness of the air cleaner. It is in this chamber that the ‘photo
plasma’ is created by the UV. The plasma has the effect of removing
electrons from atoms (electron deficient atoms). This creates negative
electrons, neutral atoms, and negative ions. These atoms collide with each
other and form hydroxyl radicals trace ozone, and oxygen with no unpaired
electrons (singlets). This removes many impurities from air by changing
their molecular structure. The plasma chamber effectively breaks the
contaminants to water, oxygen and carbon.
| Pros |
Cons |
-
Very effective within its remit of reducing airborne
biological contaminants (allergens, viruses, bacteria
and smells) and
chemical contaminants
(cleaning chemicals, odour masks, benzene and other VOCs),
-
Very little
pressure drop there for low fan power requirement.
-
Very quiet
-
Can
be used in systems in combination with filters or in ductwork
-
Some
devices bases on this technology are designed to produce a low
concentration of ozone. Ensure that the concentrations does not exceed 0.04 ppm (parts per million)
-
The photo plasma has the effect of imparting
charge to dust particles and this makes dust drop our of the air to the
floor. This is not as an effective way of air cleaning as a filter based air
cleaner
|
-
Dirt can build
as a layer on a UV bulb and reduce in intensity of UV emitted,
which will have a marked effect of lowering the efficiency.
-
The bulbs are
very sensitive to be touched and have to be handled very carefully. This
means that cleaning can only be done with a soft cloth and some alcohol.
They do require replacement from time to time.
-
Obviously
there is a power requirement to the UV lamp as well as the fan
-
Watch out for
strange smells being produced by some units which could be some of the
materials of construction reacting to UV, or the creation of Ozone.
The smells on the first start up usually go away as the
appliance settles down.
-
Beware of
filter based cleaners that have UV lamp added on as an afterthought. Typically
the UV aspect of the machine is useless and will not have the intensity and exposure to air that it
needs to be effective. More gimmick than air purification.
|

Incinerators
Whilst
the use of industrial scale incinerators is widespread for destroying air
borne contaminants in factory process air streams, its use is rare in
domestic air cleaners. The air enters the unit at the base and rises through
heated ceramic honeycomb matrix. The hotter the air the more complete the
destruction of allergens. Air cools before passing out of the top of the
unit.
| Pros |
Cons |
-
Quiet as
there is no fan
-
Given
sufficient time would significantly reduce
odours, dust, viruses, bacteria and spores in a small and perfectly sealed
room.
|
-
Typically
these units are so small and have such a minute airflow that they take a
very long time to treat the air in a room. As soon as a door or a
window is opened the effect is lost. Ideal for life sealed from the outside
world. Not suited to normal life
-
They rely on convection of
air through a small heated element, and do not have a fan. They never state
an air flow. If they did it would be miniscule compared to proper air
cleaners
-
Availability
of spare parts and costs
|

Ozone
With ozone based air
cleaners the unit will generate ozone with is a molecule comprising of 3
oxygen atoms. Ozone is a colourless gas which when it comes into contact with
contaminants like mould and mildew, pollen, odours, or other airborne
bacteria, one of those atoms combines with the molecules making up the
pollutants rendering them inactive by oxidation, resulting in more stable
version of oxygen, O2.
| Pros |
Cons |
|
|
- The smell of
ozone is quite distinctive (like an old laser printer) Watch out for using
systems that generate more than 0.04 ppm of ozone, as these are likely to
smell and may be likely to produce ozone concentrations above recommended
exposure limits. A unit which does smell may be located in a room that is smaller than
it was designed for. Too much ozone is actually quite bad for you.
|
Puravent is a trading website owned by Adremit Limited, Unit 5, Commercial Courtyard, Settle, North Yorkshire
BD24 9RH. Company registered in England and Wales Company number 4737680.


|